Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Snopes and H1N1


Since my earlier warnings about the swine flu vaccine, a number of people have pointed to the Snopes site which apparently debunks the concerns that I and others have raised.

The irony is that Snopes is a propaganda site purporting to be a neutral fact checking site. It tends to reflect the same biases as the mainstream media. They are highly anti-creationist, pro-IRS, etc. Several Snopes articles have been flat out wrong even on mundane subjects. So, I don't trust Snopes or Quatloos.com, though some of their information is accurate.

I have read that the adjuvant is mixed into the vaccine at the distribution point - ie the doctor's office, so it might be technically true that the vaccine is shipped with no squalene, but the squalene is added before the injection. The nasal form has no squalene at all, because squalene only excites the immune system if injected.

You read the patent yourself. Squalene is a key ingredients what Snopes says, though it may be interchangeable with polysorbate.

The information on the CDC site (http://www.cdc.gov/) is equally suspect. Consider some of their claims:

1. "Getting the flu shot is the single best way to protect against the flu."

Actually, there have been absolutely zero double blind controlled studies to test that belief. The vaccine industry so strongly believe that flu vaccine is effective, they say it would be "unethical" to actually test the vaccine where you give half of the randomly selected test subjects a placebo shot and half the vaccine. This is begging the question.

They have found that people who take flu shots are half as likely to die from flu as people who don't. However, this doesn't mean the flu shot is preventing flu (ergo hoc post propter hoc). Because the people who take flu shots are self-selected volunteer group, it may very well mean that the kind of people who voluntarily take the flu vaccine are the same group of people who tend to be healthy in the first place. Ie, people who take care of their health (and take annual vaccines) may be half as likely to die from flu, regardless of whether they take the vaccine.

2. "Research has found that pregnant women who had a flu shot get sick less often with the flu than do pregnant women who did not get a flu shot."

The vaccine circular states that it has not been tested to see how it affects pregnancy or the reproductive system. So the CDC is making different claims than the actual vaccine manufacturers.

Additionally, in Canada it has been reported that people who take the seasonal flu shot are MORE likely to go into intensive care from Swine flu.

3. "Seasonal and 2009 H1N1 flu shots can be given on the same day but should be given at different sites."

No studies have been shown to determine if this is safe. Since flu shots contain adjuvants such as thimerosol and squalene, both of which have adverse effects that increase with dosage, it seems common sense to think that taking a double dose in the same day, when one has a fetus on board is not a good idea.

4. "Flu shots have not been shown to cause harm to pregnant women or their babies."

Has this even been tested? Quite a few women have been reporting micarriages after taking flu shots, especially 2009 H1N1. It certainly hasn't been tested on H1N1.

5. The patent is 2008.

The patent for the swine flu vaccine is 2008. Of course that raises questions, like, how did they patent the vaccine for a specific disease before the outbreak of that new virus occured? We'll not touch that question. Another question is, "If the seasonal flu shot is patented under a different process than the 2009 H1N1 vaccine, then how can you say that the two vaccines are equally safe? If no testing in people was done with the new vaccine until September 2009, how can you say that you know it is safe?"

The CDC is a government agency, which makes me wonder if it is more of a propaganda machine than anything else.

Monday, December 21, 2009

A music lesson from the Phillips' family


On October 31, our church had a Reformation Day party and our family gave the following presentation on the role that music played during the English reformation. Following is a copy of the script I wrote, together with some illustrations our children helped to create.

Daddy:

We want to share with you a bit about how the Protestant reformation affected music in England. First Matthew is going to explain about the important role that the church played in 16th century music

Matthew:

In the 16th century, musicians, including composers, were servants. They were regarded as craftsmen, not artists in the modern sense.

This meant that a musician’s livelihood, and therefore his ability to make music, depended entirely on pleasing his patrons.

The biggest patron was the church itself. This meant that developments in the church would inevitably have musical consequences.

Music was an important part of the Roman Catholic mass. Just as the metaphysics of the mass became increasingly complicated in the late middle ages, so the music that accompanied the mass began to get more and more elaborate and complex.

Furthermore, just as the mass was denied to the laity, who were only given access to the bread but not the wine, so the music of the mass was inaccessible to ordinary people who couldn’t understand the Latin text.

Mummy:

As an example of what Matthew has been talking about, we’re going to play you a Marian antiphon by the English composer John Browne. It is called “O Mary the mother of the savior.” It was written to be sung during the mass sometime during the late 15th or early 16th century.
Some things to notice in this work are:

· The complex rhythms
· Eight separate vocal parts
· Constantly changing vocal textures
· Melisma, which means one syllable of text spanning an entire group of notes. Not infrequently, individual syllables carry such lengthy melodic lines that consecutive syllables in a word become widely separated; the words thus lose their identity and significance and so cease to have any coherent meaning.

Play Example 1 (around two minutes of it)

Timothy:

King Henry the 8th was king of England from 1509 - 1547. He was part of the Tudor family.
King Henry was a bad king. He wasted the country’s money. He also didn’t have very much self-control.

Not only was King Henry a bad king, but he was also a bad husband. He even had two of his wives’ heads chopped off. A husband should never chop off his wife’s head.


When King Henry wanted to get rid of his first wife, he divorced her. In order to do this, Henry had to first get the Pope’s permission. When the pope (pictured right) wouldn’t agree, King Henry broke away from the Roman Catholic church and started the church of England. This happened in 1534 with the Act of Supremacy.

Esther:

Henry’s break from the Roman Catholic church is usually considered the beginning of the English reformation, even though England, Scotland and Wales had a long tradition of Protestantism going back to the early Celtic church. However, this was the beginning of an established Protestant church in England.

Bluff King Hal was full of beans
He married half a dozen queens
For three called Kate they cried the banns
And one called Jane, and a couple of Annes.

The first he asked to share his reign
Was Kate of Aragon, straight from Spain
But when his love for her was spent
He got a divorce, and out she went.

Anne Boleyn was his second wife.
He swore to cherish her all his life,
But seeing a third, he wished instead
He chopped off poor Anne Boleyn’s head.

He married the next afternoon
Jane Seymour, which was rather soon,
But after one year as his bride
She crept into her bed and died.

Anne of Cleves was number four.
Her portrait thrilled him to the core,
But when he met her face to face
Another royal divorce took place.

Catherine Howard, number five,
Billed and cooed to keep alive.
But one day Henry felt depressed,
The executioner did the rest.

Sixth and last was Catherine Parr
Sixth and last and luckiest far
For this time it was Henry who
Hopped the twig, and a good job too.





Timothy: Although Henry was a bad king and had selfish reasons for starting the Church of England, there were many godly men in England at the time and the Lord used their work to make the English reformation into something glorious. One of the most godly men was Henry’s Archbishop, Thomas Cranmer.

Miriam:
Among the many changes that came about because of the reformation was something called The Act of Uniformity which required one uniform prayer book in the English language to be used in the church. This was very important because for a long time worship in the English churches had only been conducted in Latin.

To meet this new need, the archbishop, Thomas Cranmer, put together the Book of Common Prayer. The prayer book had everyone at church, not merely the ministers, involved in the worship of God. It achieved this by putting worship in the English language and also by having a lot of congregational participation in the service.

This meant that people no longer come to church just as spectators while the priests and the musicians got on with the business of worshiping God. The people were now included in the worship of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Naturally, this shift would have musical consequences. New music would be required with a text that could be understood by everybody. This aspect of reform did not come about until the reign of Henry’s son, Edward VI, who assumed his father’s throne in 1547.

Daddy: Thomas Tallis was an English composer who lived from 1505 to 1585. As a craftsman in the service of the church, Tallis produced whatever music was required of him and was prepared to adapt to the different religious and political circumstances. Because his career spanned four different English monarchs, he had quite a lot of practice adjusting his musical style to the theological demands of the moment.

The first ten years of Tallis’ career occurred before the English reformation. During these years Tallis was employed by different monastic establishments. Here is an example of the type of piece he composed during this period, although the precise date of this piece is unknown. It is a hymn to Mary called “Rejoice in the glorious mother of God.” Notice how it is similar to the Browne extract that we already played for you.

Play Example 2

Miriam:
Now we want you to compare that to a piece that Tallis wrote after England had become Protestant.

The piece you are about hear was written by Thomas Tallis during the reign of Edward VI. The words come from the gospel of John where Jesus said “If you love me, keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever.”

Mummy:

When listening to this piece, notice that it is in the English language rather than Latin.
Notice that the parts are simple enough so that the words are understandable. Although there is some limited imitation, the work is has a simplicity about it that represents the Protestant emphasis.

Both Archbishop Cranmer and Edward VI are said to have asked musicians to only have one note per syllable, so that the meaning of the words wouldn’t be overshadowed by the music. Five years before the Act of Uniformity, archbishop Cranmer had written to the king saying, “in my opinion, the song that should be made thereunto would not be full of notes, but, as near as may be, for every syllable a note, so that it may be sung distinctly and devoutly.” Although Tallis doesn’t quite keep to that, you can see that he is trying to be a good servant to those who are paying him.

Play Example 3

Robin:

Thomas Tallis lived to see the English reformation overturned in England by Bloody Mary. This gave him a chance to write more complex music for the Latin mass

Because Tallis was such a masterful composer, he could make beautiful music that glorified God no matter who was on the throne and no matter what language he was writing in.

Tallis’ music is very valuable to us because the changes in his style parallel the developments of the English reformation. It is also valuable because it shows that simplicity can be just as beautiful as complexity. It also reminds us that the worship of God is something that includes everyone – men, woman and children – not just experts..









Friday, December 18, 2009

Guilty for existing?

Do you feel guilty for existing? If you do, click HERE.

Global warming and gender

.
The United Nations Population Fund has urged us to consider "the gender dimension of climate change.” And just so we understand their terms, they tell us that “Gender refers to the differences in socially constructed roles and opportunities associated with being a man or a woman and the interactions and social relations between men and women.”
.
Okay.
.
.

Complete list of my Examiner articles so far

.
Click HERE for a complete list of my articles with the Spokane Examiner.
.
.

Copenhagen conference

The following information about the Copenhagen conference is taken from the Christian Voice website.

It is the first time in an international treaty that the word 'government' has been used of an globalised enforcement agency

Page 18 of the treaty proclaims, "The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following: (a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. (b) The Convention's financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows. (c) The Convention's facilitative mechanism will include..."

'COP' stands for Conference Of the Parties. It is the highest body of the United Nations Climate Change Convention, consisting of environment ministers of the various nations. The COP will have authority to extract and distribute the funds which the richer nations will pay to the poorer, and enforce the treaty amongst all the nations, bypassing national parliaments.

The payments to third world nations will flow through the World Bank, which establishes interest rates on loans it will issue to underdeveloped countries. The treaty discloses the World Bank's role on page 39 and again on pages 67 and 129. With this "front" of climate change, and saving the environment, the World Bank and the small group of the bank's private owners, will profit.

The President of the World Bank, Robert Zoellick, openly admitted its role in a plan to eliminate national sovereignty and impose a global government during a speech on the eve of the G20 summit at the end of March. He said, "If leaders are serious about creating new global responsibilities or governance, let them start by modernizing multilateralism to empower the WTO (World Trade Organization), the IMF (International Monetary Fund), and the World Bank Group to monitor national policies."

Last year, Henry Kissinger, who has held numerous positions in several administrations from Richard Nixon to George H. W. Bush, told an interviewer last year, "There is a need for a new world order. I think that at the end of this administration, with all its turmoil, and at the beginning of the next, we might actually witness the creation of a new order."

In April, at the G20 Summit, Prime Minster Gordon Brown said, "From today we will together manage the process of globalisation." "Today's decisions, of course, will not immediately solve the crisis. But we have begun the process by which it will be solved," Mr Brown said. "I think a new world order is emerging with the foundation of a new progressive era of international co-operation..."

Spooky video on over population

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Bill of Rights

.
With today being the anniversary of the day when the first 10 amendments to the Constitution were adopted as a group in 1791, I have written an article for the Spokane Libertarian Examiner on the Bill of Rights, exploring some of the ways that this document is often misunderstood. Click HERE to read the article.
.

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Books I've finished reading this month






The Christmas season

The beginning and end of Christmas tends to be fuzzy for most people. It begins whenever you want it to - even though everyone complains that it starts earlier every year - and ends whenever you get around to taking down the tree and lights.

Not so in our family. Advent begins on the fourth Sunday before December 25 and is the time when we prepare for Christmas. This is a time to anticipate the coming of Jesus at Christmas, singing songs like "Oh come, oh come Emmanuel." Advent can also include putting up the Christmas decorations, although we choose to leave that for a week before Christmas day.

December 25 is the beginning, not the end, of the Christmas season. The season lasts all the way until Epiphany on January 6.

For more about why we structure things like this - which is the historic Christian way - and why it is important, see my article HERE.
.

Click here to read my political column in the Spokane Libertarian Examiner

.

To join my mailing list, send a blank email to phillips7440 (at sign) roadrunner.com with “Blog Me” in the subject heading.